Should a man pay for dinner? Short answer: Yes. Yes! YES, pay!
Longer answer: (yes if…)
…the concept of a chivalrous act that has persisted when many others have diminished, is not financially driven.
James Michael Sama
Before we all get our feminist backs up, let’s examine my reasoning.
Men might think we don’t have to do that.
But … aside from the fact that they don’t want us showing up like we’ve been in a jungle for months …
Women, feminist or not, feel good making an effort to look good for men, because men appreciate the result and usually say so.
(You look beautiful goes a long way, baby. Note: Don’t let him call you baby until he’s earned it!)
And a man paying for dinner makes him feel good when a woman appreciates the gesture.
The gesture of giving is not only a gift for the woman, but it’s also a gift for the man, if graciously accepted and verbally appreciated by the woman.
He gets to provide—one of three basic masculine needs—and she gets to be provided for.
If a man wants to provide for a woman, don’t get mad at him. Be appreciative!
But also, don’t take advantage of him.
If the man isn’t traditional and/or the woman isn’t sincerely appreciative, then he may feel taken for granted or taken advantage of.
Not cool, ladies.
My recommendation is to figure out if your values match before you date with casual chitchat about modern vs. traditional values and what that means to each of you.
But, Anna, that’s kind of personal don’tcha think? What if our values don’t match?
Um, well, then why would y’all be going on any kind of date? Save your time for the right partner.
Again, if you’re looking for a long-term partner—if you’re here, that’s your goal—then it’s advisable to investigate (but not interrogate) your potential partners in advance.
Let’s say you’re a CEO looking to buy a company—whether you’re a man or a woman, this applies—and you’re planning on investing a bunch of your own money and time to make the company grow.
You don’t simply look at the brochure and say, That looks great, let’s do it! You do some homework, right?
And even though you might one day sell that company, when we’re talking about love, our goal is to keep it (love), so doesn’t it make sense to discover if the two of you have a foundation for compatibility first! (Rhetorical.)
Non, non, mes chéris!
That is the costly mistake most people make: assuming that a dinner date is to discover whether or not there is compatibility.
The dinner date is to further discover each other after you’ve determined there are no deal breakers.
And if you met online, the dinner date will let you know if there’s physical chemistry, as in sexual attraction, because a best-me photo and a voice on the phone cannot show what the sniffer must know.
Sexual attraction most often includes the right mix of pheromones (which can be influenced, but that’s a whole other blog).
Many men are what I like to call modern traditionalists—just made that up—they practice chivalry while supporting women’s lib.
Example: In a committed relationship, the dude pays for dining out, entertainment and rent; the dudette pays for groceries and childcare. They both work and contribute.
There’s a difference between sexism and modern traditionalism.
The woman does her part and likes it because it’s her choice. She’s a modern traditionalist.
I consider myself a modern traditionalist.
Even when I was making more money than my then husband, he usually insisted on picking up the tab.
He felt like he was providing, and I felt like I was being provided for. Win-win.
But I contributed equally, and sometimes more: I bought the groceries; household things, including furniture; and paid for most of the big vacations.
As far as financial contribution went, this worked for us. I felt taken care of; he felt manly.
Notice there is no mention of money for sex.
However, if a man and woman’s values align with conventional traditionalism, then both may be okay with him paying for everything and her putting out. (Can we say, Sugar Daddy?)
There is nothing wrong with a conventionally traditional relationship as long as it’s both parties’ choice and there’s mutual respect.
There is nothing wrong with modern modernism, either.
If she brings home the bacon, and he fries it up in a pan, and they both like pan-fried bacon—or Tofurky for the anti-animal consumers—then that’s ok, too.
If you and your potential partner don’t discuss your values before the first dinner date, then you’ll discover it along the way.
Ladies, if you never pick up the tab or even offer, that says something.
If you insist on paying your own way, that says something.
And if you allow him to pay, but offer to pay next time, that says something.
So what do you think? Should a man pay for dinner or not so much?
If you’re interested in learning what masculine men really want in a woman and how you can get the man of your dreams without compromising who you are, check out my WakeUP2Luv program.
Dating, Love and Relationship Coach Founder: Wingmam, Vancouver, Canada Warning: Not PC, not a feminist ❤️